Skip to content

[pull] master from git:master#119

Merged
pull[bot] merged 6 commits intoturkdevops:masterfrom
git:master
Oct 24, 2025
Merged

[pull] master from git:master#119
pull[bot] merged 6 commits intoturkdevops:masterfrom
git:master

Conversation

@pull
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pull pull bot commented Oct 24, 2025

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

gitster and others added 6 commits October 17, 2025 11:40
…from-contents-fix

* ly/diff-name-only-with-diff-from-content:
  diff: ensure consistent diff behavior with ignore options
In --quiet mode, since we produce only an exit code for "something was
changed" and no actual output, we can often get by with just a
tree-level diff. However, certain options require us to actually look at
the file contents (e.g., if we are ignoring whitespace changes). We have
a flag "diff_from_contents" for that, and if it is set we call
diff_flush() on each path.

To avoid producing any output (since we were asked to be --quiet), we
traditionally just redirected the output to /dev/null. That changed in
b55e6d3 (diff: ensure consistent diff behavior with ignore options,
2025-08-08), which replaced that with a "dry_run" flag. In theory, with
dry_run set, we should produce no output. But it carries a risk of
regression: if we forget to respect dry_run in any of the output paths,
we'll accidentally produce output.

And indeed, there is at least one such regression in that commit, as it
covered only the case where we actually call into xdiff, and not
creation or deletion diffs, where we manually generate the headers. We
even test this case in t4035, but only with diff-tree, which does not
show the bug by default because it does not require diff_from_contents.
But git-diff does, because it allows external diff programs by default
(so we must dig into each diff filepair to decide if it requires running
an external diff that may declare two distinct blobs to actually be the
same).

We should fix all of those code paths to respect dry_run correctly, but
in the meantime we can protect ourselves more fully by restoring the
redirection to /dev/null. This gives us an extra layer of protection
against regressions dues to other code paths we've missed.

Though the original issue was reported with "git diff" (and due to its
default of --ext-diff), I've used "diff-tree -w" in the new test. It
triggers the same issue, but I think the fact that "-w" implies
diff_from_contents is a bit more obvious, and fits in with the rest of
t4035.

Reported-by: Jake Zimmerman <jake@zimmerman.io>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier, we added is a protection for the loop that computes "git
diff --quiet -w" to ensure calls to the diff_flush_patch_quietly()
helper stays quiet.  Do the same for another loop that deals with
options like "--name-status" to make calls to the same helper.

Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Recently we attempted to improve "git diff -w" and friends to
handle cases where patch output would be suppressed, but it
introduced a bug that emits unnecessary output, which has been
corrected.

* jk/diff-from-contents-fix:
  diff: restore redirection to /dev/null for diff_from_contents
The code to squelch output from "git diff -w --name-status"
etc. for paths that "git diff -w -p" would have stayed silent
leaked output from dry-run patch generation, which has been
corrected.

* jc/diff-from-contents-fix:
  diff: make sure the other caller of diff_flush_patch_quietly() is silent
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
@pull pull bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 24, 2025
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Oct 24, 2025
@pull pull bot merged commit 1d10771 into turkdevops:master Oct 24, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants